BIO 304 · AI Use Policy

AI is a study tool. It is not your ghostwriter.

You are training for a career where integrity has direct consequences for human lives. The habits you build now are the habits you carry into clinical practice. This page lays out exactly what AI use is allowed in BIO 304, what is not, and how the difference is detected. When you have read it, sign the AI Honor Contract.

Open the AI Honor Contract

The standard

All submitted work must be your own.

Academic dishonesty in this course includes copying answers, sharing quiz questions, submitting AI-generated content as your own, plagiarizing text or images, and using unauthorized references during a proctored exam. The full ARC student conduct policy is the institutional standard. This page is how that standard applies to AI in BIO 304.

What's allowed and what's not

AI is a study tool. It is not a substitute for the work.

Allowed

AI as a study tool

Use AI after you have done your own work to:

  • Clarify concepts that didn't click in the reading or video
  • Quiz yourself with practice questions
  • Organize your own thinking before you write
  • Check your reasoning against an explanation you generated
  • Generate practice scenarios for your own study

Not allowed

AI as a ghostwriter

Do not use AI to produce:

  • Lab workbook drawings
  • Discussion posts or replies
  • Synthesis answers on lab workbooks
  • Clinical portfolio content
  • Any quiz answer (Honorlock treats this as a violation automatically)

Why the policy is this strict

Allied health work runs on what's actually in your head.

BIO 304 prepares students for nursing, EMT, paramedic, dental hygiene, respiratory therapy, surgical tech, and mortuary science. In every one of those careers, what you can recall and reason through on the spot is the safety system. There is no AI between you and the patient at 2 a.m. Building the habit of doing your own thinking now is the point of the course.

AI is not bad. AI used to replace the work just deprives you of the practice that builds the recall you will need later.

How AI use is detected

The hand-labeled workbook is the primary mechanism.

AI-generated content has predictable signatures: uniform style, certain phrasing patterns, factual hallucinations that conflict with the textbook, and structures that do not match the prompt. The course design exploits this on purpose.

Handwriting requirement

Lab workbooks are submitted as scanned PDFs of hand-labeled diagrams and handwritten synthesis answers. A digital workbook with no handwriting and no revision history is treated as AI-generated by default.

Style signatures

Uniform sentence rhythm, the same hedging phrases across students, and structures that don't match the actual prompt are all signals. Real student writing has individual fingerprints.

Hallucination checks

When AI invents an anatomical structure or a physiological mechanism that doesn't exist in OpenStax 2e, that's a tell. The textbook is the truth source.

Honorlock on quizzes

Quizzes are proctored. Honorlock treats any AI use during a quiz as a violation automatically. There is no "but I was just looking something up" interpretation.

What happens if the policy is broken

First instance, second instance, course-level consequences.

The escalation follows ARC's student conduct procedures. For specifics, see the official ARC student conduct page linked from the syllabus. In this course, the practical path is: first violation gets a zero on the assignment plus a documented conversation with me; second violation goes to the dean of students; quiz violations through Honorlock follow Honorlock's own escalation regardless of severity.

You've read the policy. Now sign the contract.

Every student signs the AI Honor Contract in Week 1. Due Tuesday, June 9, 2026.

Open the contract